The Venice Stakeholders Association is dedicated to civic improvement. The VSA supports slow growth, protection of the limits of the Venice Local Coastal Specific Plan, neighborhood safety, better traffic circulation, increased parking for residents, neighborhood beautification projects, historic preservation and protection of coastal waters.
I am writing to indicate our organization's opposition to motions on SB
827 and changing parking rules for Pacific Avenue.
The Venice Stakeholders Association is a non-profit organization
committed to quality-of-life improvements, public safety, and traffic
and parking enhancements.
At the very least SB 827 would allow, by right, eight story buildings in
all directions one-quarter of a mile from the Windward Traffic Circle
and four story buildings one-half mile from the circle. It also would
waive existing parking requirements at a time that parking is scarcer
than ever in Venice.
Venice residents have consistently fought to keep Venice's shoreline
from being "Miami-ized." Residents have similarly opposed abandoning
the three-story height restrictions of the Venice Local Coastal Specific
When I ran for City Council last year I consistently heard from
residents that they were opposed to the "maxing out" of just the
existing three-story building envelope. Almost to a person, there was no
support for allowing four story buildings, much less eight stories. No
one favored reducing parking requirements.
Senator Weiner should impose his misguided proposals on his Bay Area
district and refrain from attempting to legislate land-use rules for
communities he knows next to nothing about.
Within the small number of Venice residents who support SB 827 are
likely to be those property owners who would profit by a doubling of
their buildable envelope - from three stories to eight stories; I
believe that at least one VNC Board member should recuse themselves from
voting on this measure as they own property in close proximity to the
Windward Traffic Circle.
I also urge your Board to reject changes to parking rules along Pacific
Avenue. Residents and visitors alike sorely need the four lane
north-south traffic capacity provided during the day along Pacific,
especially on weekends. And residents sorely need the parking provided
over night on weekends and throughout the week. Increased traffic
enforcement, added traffic lights and crosswalks, and lower speed limits
are all better solutions.
These proposals are ill-advised and your Board would be out-of-step with
Venice residents were you to approve either of these motions.
Thank you for consideration of our views on these matters.
Today I spoke on KPCC's popular AirTalk program with anchor Larry Mantle and opposed the City Council's proposal to waive environmental, height and parking requirements for homeless projects such as those proposed for the Venice Boulevard Median and Thatcher Yard in the Oxford Triangle. You can listen to it at: www.scpr.org/programs/airtalk/2018/02/12/61688/la-is-considering-fast-tracking-some-homeless-hous
Our Venice friends Heidi Roberts and John
Betz are opening a newly constructed four-unit
building in South LA that they will be operating as collaborative housing
for the homeless. It will house 26 people in a shared living situation,
college dorm style, built on relatively inexpensive land. This is the type of project to which the City must shift its resources - instead of 640 square foot units that house just one person in tony Westside neighborhoods - or it will never catch up with the sheer number of homeless on our streets (and unfortunately in our neighborhoods). Right now they need donations of furnishings.
Here's their story on the subject and the current project in their own words:
Throughout the past decade, we’ve tried to create change in a variety
of ways: working within the bureaucratic homeless industry, fighting
against it, learning about best practices in other regions, kvetching
about hypocrisy and waste, collaborating with politicians to align on
clear goals, writing on social media ad nausea and even suing the CIty
over lame decisions they’ve made. Finally, we decided to stop bitching
and moaning and redirect our energy to address homelessness ourselves.
Here in our new project they’ll have a home and the stability needed
to re-group, recover and restart to ultimately lead productive,
successful lives. The non-profit homeless service SHARE! will be supporting their efforts from a
social-emotional perspective and we’ll be providing a fully furnished
and equipped home for them.
named this project "Weller House," in honor of the awesome Chaplain
Steve Weller and his equally amazing wife and Co-Chaplain Regina Weller
of the Homeless Task Force in Venice. Steve and Regina have literally
housed hundreds - maybe even thousands - over the years and we wanted to
honor their contributions to our community. Sadly, Steve passed away
last year but Regina has been at our side throughout this process to
help plan, design and build this fantastic collaborative community.
House is almost ready to open - we’re thinking the first people will be
moving in around March 1st. In the meantime, we’re busy finalizing all
the details, turning the power on, cable installed, insurance set, etc.
We’re also furnishing Weller House - for 26 people! We’ve got beds and
linens all set and some furnishings, but can use some additional help.
IKEA has been our second home and we’ve been scouring thrift stores and
craigslist for furnishings, but we still need more. We’re hopeful that
you may have some household things you’re looking to lose! John and I
will be renting a U-Haul next week and we’re happy to swing by and fetch
any items you might be willing to part with.
Specifically, we need:
Outdoor Furniture (tables and chairs)
Kitchen stuff/small appliances
Bath towels (in good condition)
We’re good on couches for now and we have specific beds/bedding being delivered in the coming weeks.
very hopeful that Weller House is the first of many collaborative
houses. Our plan is to systematize and perfect this approach so other
private investors can replicate Weller House and together we can
actually get people off the streets and into proper homes! We’re
feeling so positive about this plan that we’re purchasing a second
building that will be completed in a few months. So if you don’t have
anything to donate to Weller House next week, save it for the next
project: Chez Dre!
you in advance for anything you can throw our way and we’ll keep you
posted on our progress. In the meantime, you can learn more about the
Wellers here: https://www.homelesstaskforce.solutions
Please support the continuation of the closure of Venice Beach and Boardwalk 12-5 AM for reasons of public safety. The City has foolishly decided to file for a Coastal Development Permit (CDP) to maintain its decades-old park closure policy from 12 to 5 AM. This is an exposure the City should not risk as closing the beach at any time is well within the exercise of its inherent police powers; e.g., the Los Angeles County Lifeguards did not get a CDP to close the beach last year during lightening storms that threatened to electrocute anyone out on the beach. In the first step in the CDP process, the Rec. and Parks Department applied for a City CDP to the City's Board of Public Works, which was granted. Now, the usual suspects, which include the head of the Venice Family Clinic and other homeless advocates who filed the earlier lawsuit that led to the City filing for the CDP, have filed an appeal which will be heard this Friday before the Los Angeles City Board of Public Works (DPW). Fortunately, DPW staff at this point has recommended denying the appeal and maintaining the beach closures at night on all of LA's beaches. To support the CDP for the beach closure policy please send a simple message, such as: I support the City 12-5 AM Beach Park Closure Ordinance. I urge you to deny the appeal of the Coastal Development Permit for the Beach Park Closure Ordinance.
Send it to: email@example.com and firstname.lastname@example.org
Send copies to: email@example.com and firstname.lastname@example.org
The Board agenda is here: http://ens.lacity.org/bpw/agendas/bpwagendas86117942 01192018.htm
The staff report is here: http://boe.lacity.org/docs/dpw/agendas/2018/201801/2018019/boe/20180119 ag br boe 1.pdf
Thanks and best wishes to you and yours for the New Year.
1) Average cost to build a SINGLE UNIT of “supportive housing” for L.A.’s homeless: $421,433 2) Cost to BUY a 1-bedroom CONDO in Westlake, or a 4-bedroom HOME in Riverside: $421,000 3) Number of homeless units built under Mayor Garcetti with $1.2 billion in HHH bonds: ZERO 4) Cash spent by developers in 2017 to influence the City Council, mayor & officials to build MORE luxury housing: $4.8 million 5) Skid Row’s average rent after the City Council gentrified the area for urban hipsters: $1,900/mo. 6) Of 20 new residential towers slated for South Park DTLA, number that offer affordable units – TWO 7) Affordable units planned for Westfield Promenade’s 1,400-unit mega-project in the Valley: ZERO 8) Number of households evicted by L.A. landlords so they could jack up rents in 2017: 1,200 9) Number of affordable bungalows & units razed by L.A. developers in 2017: “City Hall doesn’t keep track.” 10) Number of toilets Garcetti opened for 1,800 homeless people on Skid Row in 2017: EIGHT
“They just announced that the Skirball fire was caused by
an illegal cooking fire at a homeless encampment. Venice would’ve been burned
down 1000 times over if we had trees and brush. All those devastated lives. It
just enrages me.”
Carissa, thank you for your original post. The City has been aware
of the potential for such a fire for years but has not brought the resources to
bare to prevent it. A year or two ago we saw a fire in the Palisades Bluffs
started from a homeless encampment. Fortunately, there was little wind and the
LAFD was on it quickly and kept it from coming up the bluffs and igniting the
homes atop the bluff. Since then there has been some attention to keeping
people from living in the bluffs and canyons but not at zero tolerance level,
which is what is needed. Garcetti was rather glib, saying that the City
just could not protect against every eventuality, in effect saying that it was
OK with him for residents to live with the risk of the loss of their homes and
possibly their lives. This is not to mention the high cost to the City from
such a fire as we just saw in Bel Air. We have seen the danger here in Venice,
too. Last year a homeless woman lit a fire in a dumpster behind the St. Joseph
Center's drop-in center on Lincoln. The fire spread and the smoke engulfed the
house next to the alley. The pregnant resident was told by the EMT's that for
her health and the health of her unborn child that she must evacuate the house for
several days to avoid the smoke. Residents near the center have long requested 24-hour
security because the homeless do not leave the area when the center closes for
the evening. Of course, St. Joseph's has never responded. The City's acceptance
of homeless encampments next to residences is perverse. Rick Swinger's proposal
to establish camps of high-quality tents, with adjoining toilets and showers,
on public land at some set-back from residences and businesses, with constant
social service presence, is long overdue. Along with daily removal of campers
from public lands which are at risk for fire.Measure H will produce $335
million a year for services. The County should spend a percentage on rapid
housing, including motel vouchers, family reunification and high-quality tents
on platforms, like Rick has proposed. Accepting the fire risk, as Garcetti and Bonin
do, is grossly irresponsible.