Please sign the petition at:
www.fightbackvenice.org/be-heard-psh-opposition.
The proposed PSH ordinance will exempt big-density housing projects -- including the proposed 2-acre homeless project in the Oxford Triangle and other projects such as the Venice Median project and the project proposed for the Metro lot on Main Street - from zoning approvals, size and density restrictions, parking requirements, and environmental review, stripping communities of any say in these matters.
This is anti-democratic and reckless - especially in an area as congested and susceptible to environmental risks (liquafaction, tsunami, earthquake faults and rising sea levels) as Venice.
The Venice Stakeholders Association is dedicated to civic improvement. The VSA supports slow growth, protection of the limits of the Venice Local Coastal Specific Plan, neighborhood safety, better traffic circulation, increased parking for residents, neighborhood beautification projects, historic preservation and protection of coastal waters.
Friday, October 27, 2017
Monday, October 23, 2017
Please Contribute Funds to VSA's Public Nuisance Lawsuit
We are appealing our lawsuit against the City and County for maintaining a dangerous and sordid public nuisance along the Boardwalk and Venice's beachfront.
We know the City and County are capable of keeping the Venice Beach Recreation Area clean of debris and personal possessions; just look at the pristine park next to LA's City Hall or the parks in Marina del Rey, which are controlled by the County of Los Angeles.
We are a few thousand dollars short of meeting the full retainer of our attorney, Venice resident and veteran appeals counsel Jonathan Deer. Jon is handling our appeal for a modest, fixed price because he lives here and is committed to helping us clean up the beach.
Please contribute $50 to $500 to the VSA, earmarked for Public Nuisance Lawsuit. Donations may be made on this page by credit card, or by check to 1615 Andalusia Avenue, Venice, CA 90291.
Many thanks for helping make Venice a safer place, for residents and visitors alike.
We know the City and County are capable of keeping the Venice Beach Recreation Area clean of debris and personal possessions; just look at the pristine park next to LA's City Hall or the parks in Marina del Rey, which are controlled by the County of Los Angeles.
We are a few thousand dollars short of meeting the full retainer of our attorney, Venice resident and veteran appeals counsel Jonathan Deer. Jon is handling our appeal for a modest, fixed price because he lives here and is committed to helping us clean up the beach.
Please contribute $50 to $500 to the VSA, earmarked for Public Nuisance Lawsuit. Donations may be made on this page by credit card, or by check to 1615 Andalusia Avenue, Venice, CA 90291.
Many thanks for helping make Venice a safer place, for residents and visitors alike.
Saturday, October 7, 2017
VSA Public Nuisance Lawsuit Against City and County for Dangerous Conditions on Boardwalk Goes Forward
The VSA's lawsuit against the City and County of Los Angeles for intolerable conditions along the Venice Boardwalk and beach is finally moving ahead.
After waiting over a year for the trial court to assemble the formal record, our attorney Jonathan Deer, a Venice resident and veteran appellate attorney, has begun work on the VSA's appeal brief.
Jon's analysis is that it was inappropriate for the appellate court to initially reverse the trial court's decision in favor of the VSA and our individual plaintiffs. Jon maintains that there are issues in the case that must be tried by a jury and thus are not subject to the City's and County's motions for summary judgment.
Jon has agreed to a fixed fee for all legal work, court appearances, etc., involved in the case.
If you would like to support the suit, contributions from $50 to $1,000 are welcome. Donations may be made by PayPal on the VSA's website or by check sent to the VSA, 1615 Andalusia Avenue, Venice, CA 90291.
After waiting over a year for the trial court to assemble the formal record, our attorney Jonathan Deer, a Venice resident and veteran appellate attorney, has begun work on the VSA's appeal brief.
Jon has agreed to a fixed fee for all legal work, court appearances, etc., involved in the case.
If you would like to support the suit, contributions from $50 to $1,000 are welcome. Donations may be made by PayPal on the VSA's website or by check sent to the VSA, 1615 Andalusia Avenue, Venice, CA 90291.
Saturday, September 16, 2017
Letter from a Concerned Venice Resident about the Fallacy that Pending Housing Projects Will Help Venice
As a 22-year resident and property owner in Venice, I feel I
have some perspective on the homeless situation and how it’s changed for the
worse over the past few years.
I was at the VNC meeting on Monday. It’s focus was to
convince everyone that there’s a problem with homelessness, but there were
really no answers about how the supportive housing projects would specifically relieve the dire situation we’re facing as a community here in Venice.
I was told by multiple VNC reps that only about 45 units of
the Venice median project would be allotted for the chronically homeless – and
there is no guarantee that ANY of the homeless now living in Venice would
receive that housing. In fact, statistically, none of the people currently
living on the streets of our community would get this housing. Even if 45 out
of the over 3,000 thousand homeless people living on the streets in West LA alone were
to get that housing, how, in any way, would it help our community? These
projects would provide services to not only its residents, but to other
homeless people as well. They will act as magnets, drawing even more homeless
to the streets of Venice, further exacerbating the problem.
I asked multiple representatives supporting the project this
question and no one had an answer. I also asked how will these projects
positively affect our community. The only answer I got was that “…it will get
45 people off the streets.” When I replied that this a statistically
insignificant number and that the 45 folks may not even come from Venice, I was
told “…it’s better than nothing.” When I said these projects would attract even
more homeless to the area, their reply was that “…they will come any way.”
I asked why there are 3 projects in Venice, but none in the
Palisades, Malibu or any of the other beach communities I was told, “…because
they (Malibu/Palisades) will fight the projects more than Venice.” I was
surprised by his honesty, but is this how major policy decisions should be
made?
Another resident of Venice was concerned about his property
values. He was told “…statistically, supportive housing projects have no effect on
property values.” I cannot imagine this is correct, or the stat was cherry
picked – maybe because on skid row the property values are already low, they're
not effected by creating supportive housing? Personally, I took a huge financial
risk buying property in Venice. Most of my wealth is tied up in that property.
Why should the property I’ve worked so hard for become the victim of a dubious
social program?
I asked, “If we’re really talking about providing housing
for the greatest number of people, doesn’t it make sense to create supportive
housing in areas that have lower building costs, because then you’d be able to build many more units, thus getting more people off the streets? I was told that
“…if I had time I could tell you how this works, but I’m never going to
convince you anyway.” When I expressed my frustration at his answer, he took a
morally superior tone, and I was made to feel like I was a bad person who
doesn’t care about homeless people. I do care about homeless people, but the
project they’re proposing will not address the current problems and will only
make them worse.
All this being said, I might support supportive housing in
Venice, if there was some guarantee that something would be done about the
truly disgusting and dangerous encampments at 3rd and Rose and the Boardwalk
and Rose. This is what I observed in just one week of dropping my 8 year old
daughter off at surf lessons in the parking lot at Rose Ave. at 8:45 in the
morning (no exaggerations):
A man defecating against a building on Speedway, even though
there were open public restrooms less than 100 yrds away.
Two men having a fist fight over a skateboard.
A totally naked man showering in plain view of dozens of
small children next to the playground.
Open drinking and drug use – again, in plain sight of kids.
I nearly ran over a man rolling around in the middle of
Speedway, totally out of his mind on drugs/alcohol.
When my wife picked up my daughter one afternoon, she found
the whole group of kids crying because a homeless man had lit another homeless
guy's stuff on fire. The fire was so large a fire truck had to come.
How is this acceptable? Why is this behavior condoned? How
are these squalid encampments not a health code violation? Why are the laws not
being enforced in Venice? The encampments on the beach in the Palisades was
removed. I don’t see any encampments in Malibu, or Manhattan Beach or Hermosa?
How about Beverly Hills?
I pay tens of thousands of dollars in property taxes every
year, yet I feel like I have no input in major decisions that affect my quality
of life—from the supportive housing projects, to the “road diets,” to my home
being designated an “historic property” without any public notification or
discourse or vote.
As a true stakeholder in my community, I feel it’s
unacceptable that these types of projects that directly affect my life keep
getting approved and implemented with next to no public input. The only chance
we have to make an impact is to attend the public hearings that are coming up:
Monday, Sept. 25, 2017
5pm to 7pm.
Marvin Braude Constituent Service Center
First Floor Public Meeting Room 1A/1B
6262 Van Nuys Blvd.
Van Nuys, CA 91401
Thursday, Sept. 28, 2017
5pm to 7pm
Los Angeles City Hall, Room 1060
200 N. Spring St.,
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Comments can be sent to: cally.hardy@lacity.org
I’m going and I encourage all residents of Venice to attend.
If we don’t speak up, it’s a done deal.
Regards,
Brad Morrison
Tuesday, September 12, 2017
Support for Return of Venice Taffic Lanes
This letter was sent to the Board of the Mar Vista Community Council:
Dear Neighbors,
I am writing on behalf of Venice Stakeholders Association (VSA) to urge you to vote to restore the two traffic lanes which were lost on Venice Blvd. due to Mike Bonin's misguided and dangerous reconfiguration of that boulevard in central Mar Vista.
The VSA is a non-profit organization dedicated to civic improvement. The VSA supports slow growth, protection of the limits of the Venice Specific Plan, neighborhood safety, better traffic circulation, increased parking for residents, neighborhood beautification projects, historic preservation, habitat restoration and protection of coastal waters.
The ill-conceived re-configuration of Venice Boulevard and the loss of two traffic lanes has had an immediate and detrimental impact on the life of Venice residents. As you know, traffic is at a standstill during early morning and early evening drive times. There has been a corresponding increase in cut-through traffic on other streets such as Palms, which are narrower and thus less capable of absorbing this east/west traffic.
Your residents have counted more accidents with this bizarre street/parking/bike lane layout than before it was installed.
As a long-distance cyclist I can attest to its highly unsafe design. With the bike lane hidden behind a lane of cars, those on bikes cannot see if drivers are intending to turn right and drivers cannot see whether a bike is approaching as they start a right turn across the bike lane.
I frequently ride south to Redondo Beach and north to Cross Creek. I know of no areas along those stretches (about 30 miles) which have a hidden bike lane such as one Bonin installed in your community.
And as you know, there was a perfectly acceptable bike lane on the boulevard before this change was made.
As the first-runner up in the recent Council District 11 race, I want you to know that I would not have supported the loss of two traffic lanes at this location. Our east-west traffic infrastructure simply cannot afford any lane losses, however noble the cause.
If driver speed is an issue, we would suggest that it be addressed in the old fashioned way, with the frequent placement of motorcycle police officers along the boulevard to cite speeders.
Thank you for your consideration of our views.
Sincerely,
Mark Ryavec, President
Dear Neighbors,
I am writing on behalf of Venice Stakeholders Association (VSA) to urge you to vote to restore the two traffic lanes which were lost on Venice Blvd. due to Mike Bonin's misguided and dangerous reconfiguration of that boulevard in central Mar Vista.
The VSA is a non-profit organization dedicated to civic improvement. The VSA supports slow growth, protection of the limits of the Venice Specific Plan, neighborhood safety, better traffic circulation, increased parking for residents, neighborhood beautification projects, historic preservation, habitat restoration and protection of coastal waters.
The ill-conceived re-configuration of Venice Boulevard and the loss of two traffic lanes has had an immediate and detrimental impact on the life of Venice residents. As you know, traffic is at a standstill during early morning and early evening drive times. There has been a corresponding increase in cut-through traffic on other streets such as Palms, which are narrower and thus less capable of absorbing this east/west traffic.
Your residents have counted more accidents with this bizarre street/parking/bike lane layout than before it was installed.
As a long-distance cyclist I can attest to its highly unsafe design. With the bike lane hidden behind a lane of cars, those on bikes cannot see if drivers are intending to turn right and drivers cannot see whether a bike is approaching as they start a right turn across the bike lane.
I frequently ride south to Redondo Beach and north to Cross Creek. I know of no areas along those stretches (about 30 miles) which have a hidden bike lane such as one Bonin installed in your community.
And as you know, there was a perfectly acceptable bike lane on the boulevard before this change was made.
As the first-runner up in the recent Council District 11 race, I want you to know that I would not have supported the loss of two traffic lanes at this location. Our east-west traffic infrastructure simply cannot afford any lane losses, however noble the cause.
If driver speed is an issue, we would suggest that it be addressed in the old fashioned way, with the frequent placement of motorcycle police officers along the boulevard to cite speeders.
Thank you for your consideration of our views.
Sincerely,
Mark Ryavec, President
Monday, September 11, 2017
Please Support Our Neighbors in Mar Vista to Restore All Traffic Lanes on Venice Blvd.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please share, tweet and forward this email to your neighbors.
Monday, September 4, 2017
New, Larger Restore Venice Blvd. Signs Available
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

